MPCMF
Price
$0.91
Change
-$0.09 (-9.00%)
Updated
Dec 6 closing price
NIPOF
Price
$481.76
Change
-$18.23 (-3.65%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

MPCMF vs NIPOF

Header iconMPCMF vs NIPOF Comparison
Open Charts MPCMF vs NIPOFBanner chart's image
MAPLETREE PANASIA COML TR
Price$0.91
Change-$0.09 (-9.00%)
Volume$104.46K
CapitalizationN/A
Japan Hotel REIT Investment
Price$481.76
Change-$18.23 (-3.65%)
Volume$60
CapitalizationN/A
MPCMF vs NIPOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MPCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MPCMF vs. NIPOF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPCMF is a Sell and NIPOF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MPCMF: $0.91 vs. NIPOF: $481.77)
Brand notoriety: MPCMF and NIPOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPCMF: 372% vs. NIPOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MPCMF: $6.54B vs. NIPOF: $2.44B
MPCMF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $6.54B. NIPOF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIPOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MPCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NIPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIPOF is a better buy in the long-term than MPCMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPCMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIPOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MPCMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NIPOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIPOF is a better buy in the short-term than MPCMF.

Price Growth

MPCMF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NIPOF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -3.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-3.31% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPCMF($6.54B) has a higher market cap than NIPOF($2.44B). NIPOF has higher P/E ratio than MPCMF: NIPOF (26.72) vs MPCMF (15.72). NIPOF YTD gains are higher at: 5.331 vs. MPCMF (-16.174). NIPOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15B vs. MPCMF (680M). NIPOF has more cash in the bank: 28.5B vs. MPCMF (167M). MPCMF has less debt than NIPOF: MPCMF (6.71B) vs NIPOF (165B). NIPOF has higher revenues than MPCMF: NIPOF (26.6B) vs MPCMF (682M).
MPCMFNIPOFMPCMF / NIPOF
Capitalization6.54B2.44B268%
EBITDA680M15B5%
Gain YTD-16.1745.331-303%
P/E Ratio15.7226.7259%
Revenue682M26.6B3%
Total Cash167M28.5B1%
Total Debt6.71B165B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NIPOF: Fundamental Ratings
NIPOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPCMFNIPOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MPCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCGBX2.44-0.01
-0.41%
Templeton Global Balanced C
OCMAX14.35-0.10
-0.69%
OCM Gold Atlas
VEXPX127.27-1.30
-1.01%
Vanguard Explorer Inv
BMSBX14.42-0.16
-1.10%
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq B
FMCEX38.39-0.44
-1.13%
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp C

MPCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPCMF has been loosely correlated with CRPLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPCMF jumps, then CRPLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPCMF
1D Price
Change %
MPCMF100%
N/A
CRPLF - MPCMF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SQFT - MPCMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-9.15%
STGPF - MPCMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARSSF - MPCMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
MRPRF - MPCMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NIPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIPOF and CTO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIPOF and CTO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIPOF
1D Price
Change %
NIPOF100%
N/A
CTO - NIPOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
NPONF - NIPOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRPRF - NIPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEIYF - NIPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPCMF - NIPOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More