MQ
Price
$3.69
Change
-$0.23 (-5.87%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
3 days until earnings call
RUM
Price
$10.50
Change
-$0.62 (-5.58%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.03B
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MQ vs RUM

Header iconMQ vs RUM Comparison
Open Charts MQ vs RUMBanner chart's image
Marqeta
Price$3.69
Change-$0.23 (-5.87%)
Volume$5.18M
Capitalization3.06B
Rumble
Price$10.50
Change-$0.62 (-5.58%)
Volume$2.71M
Capitalization2.03B
MQ vs RUM Comparison Chart
Loading...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MQ vs. RUM commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MQ is a Hold and RUM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MQ: $3.69 vs. RUM: $10.50)
Brand notoriety: MQ and RUM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MQ: 121% vs. RUM: 34%
Market capitalization -- MQ: $3.06B vs. RUM: $2.03B
MQ [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.06B. RUM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RUM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MQ and RUM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MQ and RUM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MQ (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.93% price change this week, while RUM (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

MQ is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

RUM is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.81% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MQ($3.06B) has a higher market cap than RUM($2.04B). MQ YTD gains are higher at: -2.639 vs. RUM (-19.293). RUM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -130.68M vs. MQ (-272.27M). MQ has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. RUM (219M). RUM has less debt than MQ: RUM (2.61M) vs MQ (16.9M). MQ has higher revenues than RUM: MQ (676M) vs RUM (81M).
MQRUMMQ / RUM
Capitalization3.06B2.04B150%
EBITDA-272.27M-130.68M208%
Gain YTD-2.639-19.29314%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue676M81M835%
Total Cash1.25B219M571%
Total Debt16.9M2.61M648%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MQRUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOTTX11.08N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps I3
ASCFX23.85N/A
N/A
Virtus Small-Cap R6
RWBEX65.96-0.88
-1.32%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R2E
DUSLX40.04-0.58
-1.43%
DFA US Large Cap Growth Instl
APSGX17.00-0.53
-3.02%
NYLI Fiera SMID Growth Class I

RUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUM has been loosely correlated with PSQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RUM jumps, then PSQH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUM
1D Price
Change %
RUM100%
-5.58%
PSQH - RUM
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.43%
PAYC - RUM
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
PHUN - RUM
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.88%
BTDR - RUM
29%
Poorly correlated
-12.32%
MQ - RUM
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.87%
More