MRCC vs NXDT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCC is a Hold and NXDT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MRCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNXDT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MRCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NXDT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MRCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NXDT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MRCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NXDT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MRCC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.81% price change this week, while NXDT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -2.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.71%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
MRCC is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.
NXDT is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-0.66% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.69% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| MRCC | NXDT | MRCC / NXDT | |
| Capitalization | 156M | 254M | 61% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.588 | -18.852 | -14% |
| P/E Ratio | 365.00 | 9.25 | 3,944% |
| Revenue | 5.47M | -75.27M | -7% |
| Total Cash | 5.32M | 165K | 3,227% |
| Total Debt | 301M | 197M | 153% |
MRCC | NXDT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRCC's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as NXDT (4). This means that MRCC’s stock grew similarly to NXDT’s over the last 12 months.
MRCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NXDT (100). This means that MRCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NXDT’s over the last 12 months.
MRCC's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NXDT (92). This means that MRCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NXDT’s over the last 12 months.
MRCC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NXDT (79). This means that MRCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NXDT’s over the last 12 months.
NXDT's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRCC (98). This means that NXDT’s stock grew significantly faster than MRCC’s over the last 12 months.
| MRCC | NXDT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 24 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 62% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UUPIX | 60.28 | 1.22 | +2.07% |
| ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Inv | |||
| VCSOX | 26.06 | -0.14 | -0.53% |
| VALIC Company I Intl Sclly Rspnb | |||
| FGEAX | 25.50 | -0.37 | -1.43% |
| Fidelity Advisor Glbl Capital Apprec A | |||
| SVFFX | 79.68 | -1.57 | -1.93% |
| Smead Value I1 | |||
| IRLSX | 81.87 | -1.75 | -2.09% |
| Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Idx Port S | |||
MRCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRCC has been loosely correlated with NXDT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRCC jumps, then NXDT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRCC | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| NXDT - MRCC | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| NEWT - MRCC | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| APAM - MRCC | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.92% | ||
| NMFC - MRCC | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| VRTS - MRCC | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
More | ||||
NXDT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NXDT has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NXDT jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NXDT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NXDT | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| BN - NXDT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| BCSF - NXDT | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| FSK - NXDT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| PSEC - NXDT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| GLAD - NXDT | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||