MRCC
Price
$6.22
Change
+$0.02 (+0.32%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
156M
40 days until earnings call
PFLT
Price
$10.23
Change
+$0.05 (+0.49%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
690.23M
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRCC vs PFLT

Header iconMRCC vs PFLT Comparison
Open Charts MRCC vs PFLTBanner chart's image
Monroe Capital
Price$6.22
Change+$0.02 (+0.32%)
Volume$35.14K
Capitalization156M
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
Price$10.23
Change+$0.05 (+0.49%)
Volume$1.27M
Capitalization690.23M
MRCC vs PFLT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRCC vs. PFLT commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCC is a StrongBuy and PFLT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MRCC: $6.22 vs. PFLT: $10.23)
Brand notoriety: MRCC and PFLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRCC: 42% vs. PFLT: 145%
Market capitalization -- MRCC: $156M vs. PFLT: $690.23M
MRCC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $156M. PFLT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $690.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFLT’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • MRCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFLT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFLT is a better buy in the long-term than MRCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRCC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFLT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRCC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PFLT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFLT is a better buy in the short-term than MRCC.

Price Growth

MRCC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.51% price change this week, while PFLT (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

MRCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

PFLT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.91% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFLT($690M) has a higher market cap than MRCC($156M). MRCC has higher P/E ratio than PFLT: MRCC (365.00) vs PFLT (9.41). PFLT YTD gains are higher at: -0.745 vs. MRCC (-21.550). PFLT has more cash in the bank: 15.1M vs. MRCC (5.32M). MRCC has less debt than PFLT: MRCC (301M) vs PFLT (671M). PFLT has higher revenues than MRCC: PFLT (65.9M) vs MRCC (5.47M).
MRCCPFLTMRCC / PFLT
Capitalization156M690M23%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-21.550-0.7452,893%
P/E Ratio365.009.413,878%
Revenue5.47M65.9M8%
Total Cash5.32M15.1M35%
Total Debt301M671M45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRCC vs PFLT: Fundamental Ratings
MRCC
PFLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1783
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4922
SMR RATING
1..100
6929
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10013
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRCC's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLT (5). This means that MRCC’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (49). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRCC (69). This means that PFLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (62). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRCC (100). This means that PFLT’s stock grew significantly faster than MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRCCPFLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMCVX9.38N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value I
UIVMX12.24N/A
N/A
MFS Intrinsic Value R1
MXMDX20.65N/A
N/A
Empower S&P Mid Cap 400® Index Inv
DTCYX19.74N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Sust US Equity Y
OLVTX19.97N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R3

MRCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRCC has been loosely correlated with FDUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRCC jumps, then FDUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRCC
1D Price
Change %
MRCC100%
+0.24%
FDUS - MRCC
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CION - MRCC
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
PFLT - MRCC
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
MAIN - MRCC
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
BBDC - MRCC
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
More

PFLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFLT has been closely correlated with CSWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFLT jumps, then CSWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFLT
1D Price
Change %
PFLT100%
+0.49%
CSWC - PFLT
77%
Closely correlated
+2.35%
FSK - PFLT
77%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
FDUS - PFLT
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
GBDC - PFLT
76%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
BCSF - PFLT
74%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
More