MRCC
Price
$6.52
Change
+$0.12 (+1.87%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
156M
61 days until earnings call
PFLT
Price
$10.34
Change
+$0.10 (+0.98%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
690.23M
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRCC vs PFLT

Header iconMRCC vs PFLT Comparison
Open Charts MRCC vs PFLTBanner chart's image
Monroe Capital
Price$6.52
Change+$0.12 (+1.87%)
Volume$100
Capitalization156M
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
Price$10.34
Change+$0.10 (+0.98%)
Volume$100
Capitalization690.23M
MRCC vs PFLT Comparison Chart
Loading...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRCC vs. PFLT commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCC is a Buy and PFLT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MRCC: $6.37 vs. PFLT: $10.24)
Brand notoriety: MRCC and PFLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRCC: 60% vs. PFLT: 70%
Market capitalization -- MRCC: $156M vs. PFLT: $690.23M
MRCC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $156M. PFLT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $690.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRCC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFLT’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • MRCC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFLT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFLT is a better buy in the long-term than MRCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRCC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFLT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRCC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PFLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MRCC and PFLT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MRCC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.16% price change this week, while PFLT (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

MRCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

PFLT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.52% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFLT($690M) has a higher market cap than MRCC($156M). MRCC has higher P/E ratio than PFLT: MRCC (365.00) vs PFLT (9.41). PFLT YTD gains are higher at: -1.625 vs. MRCC (-22.660). PFLT has more cash in the bank: 15.1M vs. MRCC (5.32M). MRCC has less debt than PFLT: MRCC (301M) vs PFLT (671M). PFLT has higher revenues than MRCC: PFLT (65.9M) vs MRCC (5.47M).
MRCCPFLTMRCC / PFLT
Capitalization156M690M23%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-22.660-1.6251,394%
P/E Ratio365.009.413,878%
Revenue5.47M65.9M8%
Total Cash5.32M15.1M35%
Total Debt301M671M45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRCC vs PFLT: Fundamental Ratings
MRCC
PFLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
423
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4317
SMR RATING
1..100
2812
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10013
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRCC's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLT (6). This means that MRCC’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (43). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (28). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (82). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRCC (100). This means that PFLT’s stock grew significantly faster than MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRCCPFLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NCIGX31.15N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Value C
AWAAX22.05N/A
N/A
AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy A
AZNAX11.09N/A
N/A
Virtus Income & Growth A
BUIBX20.73N/A
N/A
Buffalo Flexible Allocation Inst
PVCCX11.49N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Intrinsic Value C

MRCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRCC has been loosely correlated with FDUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRCC jumps, then FDUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRCC
1D Price
Change %
MRCC100%
+0.79%
FDUS - MRCC
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
PFLT - MRCC
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BBDC - MRCC
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
CION - MRCC
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
NMFC - MRCC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More

PFLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFLT has been closely correlated with CSWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFLT jumps, then CSWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFLT
1D Price
Change %
PFLT100%
N/A
CSWC - PFLT
77%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
FSK - PFLT
77%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
FDUS - PFLT
75%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
GBDC - PFLT
74%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
ARCC - PFLT
74%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
More