MRCC
Price
$6.46
Change
-$0.15 (-2.27%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
156M
88 days until earnings call
SAR
Price
$23.40
Change
+$0.68 (+2.99%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
316.76M
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MRCC vs SAR

Header iconMRCC vs SAR Comparison
Open Charts MRCC vs SARBanner chart's image
Monroe Capital
Price$6.46
Change-$0.15 (-2.27%)
Volume$217.58K
Capitalization156M
SARATOGA INVESTMENT
Price$23.40
Change+$0.68 (+2.99%)
Volume$163.87K
Capitalization316.76M
MRCC vs SAR Comparison Chart
Loading...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRCC vs. SAR commentary
May 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCC is a StrongBuy and SAR is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 10, 2025
Stock price -- (MRCC: $6.46 vs. SAR: $23.40)
Brand notoriety: MRCC and SAR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRCC: 265% vs. SAR: 155%
Market capitalization -- MRCC: $156M vs. SAR: $316.76M
MRCC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $156M. SAR’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $316.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRCC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MRCC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MRCC and SAR are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAR is a better buy in the short-term than MRCC.

Price Growth

MRCC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -7.98% price change this week, while SAR (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

MRCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

SAR is expected to report earnings on Jul 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.93% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAR($317M) has a higher market cap than MRCC($156M). MRCC has higher P/E ratio than SAR: MRCC (365.00) vs SAR (12.23). SAR YTD gains are higher at: 2.981 vs. MRCC (-21.567). MRCC has less debt than SAR: MRCC (301M) vs SAR (794M). SAR has higher revenues than MRCC: SAR (34.6M) vs MRCC (5.47M).
MRCCSARMRCC / SAR
Capitalization156M317M49%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-21.5672.981-723%
P/E Ratio365.0012.232,984%
Revenue5.47M34.6M16%
Total Cash5.32MN/A-
Total Debt301M794M38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRCC vs SAR: Fundamental Ratings
MRCC
SAR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5113
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
408
SMR RATING
1..100
2613
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10073
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRCC's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as SAR (4). This means that MRCC’s stock grew similarly to SAR’s over the last 12 months.

SAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (40). This means that SAR’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

SAR's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (26). This means that SAR’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

SAR's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (61). This means that SAR’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

SAR's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (100). This means that SAR’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRCCSAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSCAX21.75N/A
N/A
Invesco Small Cap Value A
TVLIX11.37N/A
N/A
Touchstone Value Institutional
CSVRX39.62N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Value I R
BIIGX32.96N/A
N/A
Buffalo Growth Institutional
WAGSX12.72-0.05
-0.39%
Wasatch Global Select Investor

MRCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRCC has been loosely correlated with FDUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRCC jumps, then FDUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRCC
1D Price
Change %
MRCC100%
-2.27%
FDUS - MRCC
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.04%
NMFC - MRCC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
ARCC - MRCC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
BCSF - MRCC
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
PFLT - MRCC
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More