Ad is loading...
MRVGF
Price
$1.42
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
O
Price
$56.54
Change
+$0.47 (+0.84%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
99 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MRVGF vs O

Header iconMRVGF vs O Comparison
Open Charts MRVGF vs OBanner chart's image
Mirvac Group
Price$1.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Realty Income
Price$56.54
Change+$0.47 (+0.84%)
Volume$7.98M
CapitalizationN/A
MRVGF vs O Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRVGF vs. O commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRVGF is a Hold and O is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MRVGF: $1.42 vs. O: $56.54)
Brand notoriety: MRVGF and O are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRVGF: 0% vs. O: 166%
Market capitalization -- MRVGF: $6.07B vs. O: $46.59B
MRVGF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $6.07B. O’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $46.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRVGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MRVGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • O’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRVGF is a better buy in the long-term than O.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

O’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • O’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

MRVGF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while O (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -1.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

O is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.85% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
O($46.6B) has a higher market cap than MRVGF($6.07B). O has higher P/E ratio than MRVGF: O (42.43) vs MRVGF (8.69). O YTD gains are higher at: 3.158 vs. MRVGF (0.766). O has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. MRVGF (-356M). MRVGF has more cash in the bank: 558M vs. O (233M). MRVGF has less debt than O: MRVGF (4.29B) vs O (22B). O has higher revenues than MRVGF: O (4.08B) vs MRVGF (2.28B).
MRVGFOMRVGF / O
Capitalization6.07B46.6B13%
EBITDA-356M3.6B-10%
Gain YTD0.7663.15824%
P/E Ratio8.6942.4320%
Revenue2.28B4.08B56%
Total Cash558M233M239%
Total Debt4.29B22B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRVGF vs O: Fundamental Ratings
MRVGF
O
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5055
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9584
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1033
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
14n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRVGF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for O (80) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MRVGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than O’s over the last 12 months.

MRVGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as O (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MRVGF’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.

O's SMR Rating (84) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MRVGF (95) in the null industry. This means that O’s stock grew similarly to MRVGF’s over the last 12 months.

MRVGF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as O (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MRVGF’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.

MRVGF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as O (33) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MRVGF’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
O
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SR67.011.09
+1.65%
Spire
CBOE200.712.28
+1.15%
Cboe Global Markets
DXPE68.99-0.63
-0.90%
DXP Enterprises
EOSE2.19-0.04
-1.79%
Eos Energy Enterprises
FRSX0.62-0.03
-5.13%
Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd

MRVGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRVGF and DREUF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRVGF and DREUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRVGF
1D Price
Change %
MRVGF100%
N/A
DREUF - MRVGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
MAPIF - MRVGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
O - MRVGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
IRT - MRVGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
SFSHF - MRVGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More