MRZLF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.03 (-7.50%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
TORXF
Price
$20.10
Change
+$1.14 (+6.01%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
62 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MRZLF vs TORXF

Header iconMRZLF vs TORXF Comparison
Open Charts MRZLF vs TORXFBanner chart's image
Mirasol Resources
Price$0.37
Change-$0.03 (-7.50%)
Volume$7.33K
CapitalizationN/A
Torex Gold Resources
Price$20.10
Change+$1.14 (+6.01%)
Volume$127.76K
CapitalizationN/A
MRZLF vs TORXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MRZLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TORXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRZLF vs. TORXF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRZLF is a Hold and TORXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MRZLF: $0.37 vs. TORXF: $20.10)
Brand notoriety: MRZLF and TORXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRZLF: 114% vs. TORXF: 194%
Market capitalization -- MRZLF: $42.59M vs. TORXF: $1.2B
MRZLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $42.59M. TORXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRZLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTORXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MRZLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TORXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TORXF is a better buy in the long-term than MRZLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRZLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TORXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRZLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TORXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRZLF is a better buy in the short-term than TORXF.

Price Growth

MRZLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -12.86% price change this week, while TORXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

TORXF is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TORXF($1.2B) has a higher market cap than MRZLF($42.6M). TORXF YTD gains are higher at: 82.396 vs. MRZLF (-30.299). TORXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 491M vs. MRZLF (-7.34M). TORXF has more cash in the bank: 322M vs. MRZLF (4.05M). MRZLF has less debt than TORXF: MRZLF (156K) vs TORXF (3.5M). TORXF has higher revenues than MRZLF: TORXF (890M) vs MRZLF (0).
MRZLFTORXFMRZLF / TORXF
Capitalization42.6M1.2B4%
EBITDA-7.34M491M-1%
Gain YTD-30.29982.396-37%
P/E RatioN/A5.36-
Revenue0890M-
Total Cash4.05M322M1%
Total Debt156K3.5M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRZLF vs TORXF: Fundamental Ratings
MRZLF
TORXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5355
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10063
SMR RATING
1..100
9975
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1008
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TORXF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as MRZLF (77). This means that TORXF’s stock grew similarly to MRZLF’s over the last 12 months.

TORXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRZLF (100). This means that TORXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRZLF’s over the last 12 months.

TORXF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as MRZLF (99). This means that TORXF’s stock grew similarly to MRZLF’s over the last 12 months.

MRZLF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as TORXF (44). This means that MRZLF’s stock grew similarly to TORXF’s over the last 12 months.

TORXF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRZLF (100). This means that TORXF’s stock grew significantly faster than MRZLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRZLFTORXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MRZLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TORXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSL22.560.98
+4.54%
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
ESPO86.730.72
+0.84%
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
SPYG91.05-0.33
-0.36%
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
RISN27.25-0.21
-0.75%
Inspire Tactical Balanced ETF
IVOV100.04-1.14
-1.13%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF

MRZLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRZLF and USAU have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRZLF and USAU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRZLF
1D Price
Change %
MRZLF100%
N/A
USAU - MRZLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
LUCRF - MRZLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.95%
BSXGF - MRZLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
KLKLF - MRZLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
TORXF - MRZLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
More

TORXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TORXF has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TORXF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TORXF
1D Price
Change %
TORXF100%
+6.01%
PAAS - TORXF
72%
Closely correlated
-6.14%
AEM - TORXF
71%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
RGLD - TORXF
68%
Closely correlated
-5.97%
MAG - TORXF
67%
Closely correlated
-6.44%
GOLD - TORXF
67%
Closely correlated
-4.50%
More