Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHOX vs RGAHX
MSHOX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MSHOX vs RGAHX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.78
Change+$0.37 (+2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.75
Change-$0.36 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.96B
MSHOX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHOX vs. RGAHX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHOX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. MSHOX (5.64M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: MSHOX (1.11) vs RGAHX (0.47). MSHOX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MSHOX (5 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: RGAHX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.89 vs. MSHOX (12.17). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.13 vs. MSHOX (9.04).
| MSHOX | RGAHX | MSHOX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.44 | 443% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 13.89 | 0.44 | 3,157% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.048 | 14.039 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.64M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.47 | 238% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.17 | 12.89 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.12 | 51.78 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.04 | 37.13 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |