Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSNCX vs TFBVX
MSNCX vs TFBVX Comparison
Open Charts MSNCX vs TFBVX
MFS NC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.34
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.11M
T. Rowe Price Virginia Tax Free Bond I
Price$10.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
MSNCX vs TFBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSNCX vs. TFBVX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSNCX is a Hold and TFBVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBVX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. MSNCX (466M). TFBVX pays higher dividends than MSNCX: TFBVX (3.48) vs MSNCX (3.27). MSNCX was incepted earlier than TFBVX: MSNCX (41 years) vs TFBVX (8 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than TFBVX (0.42). MSNCX (20.00) and TFBVX (19.10) have comparable annual turnover. MSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBVX: MSNCX (1000) vs TFBVX (500000). TFBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.14 vs. MSNCX (-2.25). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.11 vs. TFBVX (-1.34).
| MSNCX | TFBVX | MSNCX / TFBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.42 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.42 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.063 | -3.171 | 97% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 466M | 1.28B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 3.48 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.25 | -2.14 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.56 | 2.83 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.11 | -1.34 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement