MTA
Price
$2.71
Change
-$0.04 (-1.45%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
284.03M
68 days until earnings call
NKOSF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.01M
Ad is loading...

MTA vs NKOSF

Header iconMTA vs NKOSF Comparison
Open Charts MTA vs NKOSFBanner chart's image
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
Price$2.71
Change-$0.04 (-1.45%)
Volume$421.06K
Capitalization284.03M
Labrador Gold
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$42.35K
Capitalization25.01M
MTA vs NKOSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NKOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTA vs. NKOSF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTA is a Hold and NKOSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (MTA: $2.71 vs. NKOSF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: MTA and NKOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTA: 109% vs. NKOSF: 50%
Market capitalization -- MTA: $284.03M vs. NKOSF: $25.01M
MTA [@Precious Metals] is valued at $284.03M. NKOSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $25.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNKOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NKOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTA is a better buy in the long-term than NKOSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NKOSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NKOSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTA is a better buy in the short-term than NKOSF.

Price Growth

MTA (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.44% price change this week, while NKOSF (@Precious Metals) price change was +23.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTA is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTA($284M) has a higher market cap than NKOSF($25M). NKOSF YTD gains are higher at: 25.581 vs. MTA (7.968). MTA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -917K vs. NKOSF (-1.22M). NKOSF has more cash in the bank: 15.7M vs. MTA (14.1M). MTA has higher revenues than NKOSF: MTA (4.6M) vs NKOSF (0).
MTANKOSFMTA / NKOSF
Capitalization284M25M1,136%
EBITDA-917K-1.22M75%
Gain YTD7.96825.58131%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.6M0-
Total Cash14.1M15.7M90%
Total Debt14.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTA vs NKOSF: Fundamental Ratings
MTA
NKOSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTA's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as NKOSF (78). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NKOSF (100). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as NKOSF (90). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

NKOSF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (62). This means that NKOSF’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

NKOSF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (100). This means that NKOSF’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTANKOSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NKOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASLGX128.471.50
+1.18%
American Century Select R5
FIVOX10.390.06
+0.58%
Fidelity Advisor International Value C
GSVPX17.220.08
+0.47%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value P
MXTFX6.980.03
+0.43%
Empower Small Cap Value Instl
PAINX8.21-0.01
-0.12%
PGIM Jennison Intl Sm-Md Cap Opps Z

MTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTA has been closely correlated with SVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTA jumps, then SVM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTA
1D Price
Change %
MTA100%
-1.45%
SVM - MTA
78%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
HL - MTA
73%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
PAAS - MTA
73%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
AEM - MTA
70%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
KGC - MTA
70%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
More

NKOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NKOSF and SSVRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NKOSF and SSVRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NKOSF
1D Price
Change %
NKOSF100%
+13.21%
SSVRF - NKOSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
EQX - NKOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
MTA - NKOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
DYNR - NKOSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
WPM - NKOSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More