MTA
Price
$3.85
Change
+$0.30 (+8.45%)
Updated
Oct 18, 11:37 AM (EDT)
21 days until earnings call
NKOSF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

MTA vs NKOSF

Header iconMTA vs NKOSF Comparison
Open Charts MTA vs NKOSFBanner chart's image
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
Price$3.85
Change+$0.30 (+8.45%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Labrador Gold
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$250
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MTA vs NKOSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
NKOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
MTA vs. NKOSF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTA is a Sell and NKOSF is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MTA: $3.55 vs. NKOSF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: MTA and NKOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTA: 49% vs. NKOSF: 0%
Market capitalization -- MTA: $284.03M vs. NKOSF: $25.01M
MTA [@Precious Metals] is valued at $284.03M. NKOSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $25.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNKOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NKOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTA is a better buy in the long-term than NKOSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NKOSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NKOSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTA is a better buy in the short-term than NKOSF.

Price Growth

MTA (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.84% price change this week, while NKOSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTA is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTA($284M) has a higher market cap than NKOSF($25M). MTA YTD gains are higher at: 15.260 vs. NKOSF (-53.782). MTA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -917K vs. NKOSF (-1.22M). NKOSF has more cash in the bank: 15.7M vs. MTA (14.1M). MTA has higher revenues than NKOSF: MTA (4.6M) vs NKOSF (0).
MTANKOSFMTA / NKOSF
Capitalization284M25M1,136%
EBITDA-917K-1.22M75%
Gain YTD15.260-53.782-28%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.6M0-
Total Cash14.1M15.7M90%
Total Debt14.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTA vs NKOSF: Fundamental Ratings
MTA
NKOSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7778
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9190
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4491
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
24n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTA's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as NKOSF (82). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NKOSF (100). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

NKOSF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (91). This means that NKOSF’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NKOSF (91). This means that MTA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NKOSF (100). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTANKOSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
NKOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

MTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTA has been closely correlated with SVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTA jumps, then SVM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTA
1D Price
Change %
MTA100%
-0.84%
SVM - MTA
78%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
HL - MTA
71%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
PAAS - MTA
69%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
SAND - MTA
68%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
EQX - MTA
67%
Closely correlated
-7.48%
More

NKOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NKOSF and SSVRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NKOSF and SSVRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NKOSF
1D Price
Change %
NKOSF100%
+2.04%
SSVRF - NKOSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
EQX - NKOSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.48%
MTA - NKOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
WPM - NKOSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
PPTA - NKOSF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More