MTA
Price
$2.71
Change
-$0.04 (-1.45%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
284.03M
68 days until earnings call
WHGOF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
42.16M
Ad is loading...

MTA vs WHGOF

Header iconMTA vs WHGOF Comparison
Open Charts MTA vs WHGOFBanner chart's image
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
Price$2.71
Change-$0.04 (-1.45%)
Volume$421.06K
Capitalization284.03M
White Gold
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20.7K
Capitalization42.16M
MTA vs WHGOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTA vs. WHGOF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTA is a Hold and WHGOF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MTA: $2.71 vs. WHGOF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: MTA and WHGOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTA: 109% vs. WHGOF: 54%
Market capitalization -- MTA: $284.03M vs. WHGOF: $42.16M
MTA [@Precious Metals] is valued at $284.03M. WHGOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $42.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHGOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHGOF is a better buy in the long-term than MTA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WHGOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTA is a better buy in the short-term than WHGOF.

Price Growth

MTA (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.44% price change this week, while WHGOF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTA is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTA($284M) has a higher market cap than WHGOF($42.2M). MTA YTD gains are higher at: 7.968 vs. WHGOF (-8.511). WHGOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 144K vs. MTA (-917K). MTA has more cash in the bank: 14.1M vs. WHGOF (3.72M). MTA has higher revenues than WHGOF: MTA (4.6M) vs WHGOF (0).
MTAWHGOFMTA / WHGOF
Capitalization284M42.2M673%
EBITDA-917K144K-637%
Gain YTD7.968-8.511-94%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.6M0-
Total Cash14.1M3.72M379%
Total Debt14.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTA vs WHGOF: Fundamental Ratings
MTA
WHGOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6285
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHGOF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (51). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

WHGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (100). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

WHGOF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (90). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as WHGOF (85). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to WHGOF’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WHGOF (100). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to WHGOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTAWHGOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASLGX128.471.50
+1.18%
American Century Select R5
FIVOX10.390.06
+0.58%
Fidelity Advisor International Value C
GSVPX17.220.08
+0.47%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value P
MXTFX6.980.03
+0.43%
Empower Small Cap Value Instl
PAINX8.21-0.01
-0.12%
PGIM Jennison Intl Sm-Md Cap Opps Z

WHGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGOF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGOF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGOF
1D Price
Change %
WHGOF100%
-3.70%
GSISF - WHGOF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.17%
ZIJMF - WHGOF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.63%
SVGAF - WHGOF
27%
Poorly correlated
+253.33%
MTA - WHGOF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
AU - WHGOF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
More