It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTAL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAOFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTAL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAOFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
MTAL (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -21.15% price change this week, while TAOFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -13.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.
MTAL is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
MTAL | TAOFF | MTAL / TAOFF | |
Capitalization | 902M | 137M | 658% |
EBITDA | -1.68M | -19.66M | 9% |
Gain YTD | -15.858 | 175.000 | -9% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 35.1K | 11.4M | 0% |
Total Debt | 1.46M | 1.15M | 127% |
MTAL | TAOFF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago34% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago33% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago50% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 2 days ago46% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago57% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago47% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FEBRX | 13.02 | -0.22 | -1.66% |
First Eagle Global Income Builder R6 | |||
LSVMX | 11.82 | -0.28 | -2.31% |
LSV US Managed Volatility Institutional | |||
FCUCX | 18.89 | -0.46 | -2.38% |
NYLI PineStone U.S. Equity Class C | |||
MITTX | 40.55 | -1.07 | -2.57% |
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr A | |||
MGFLX | 9.64 | -0.29 | -2.92% |
MassMutual Global Adm |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TAOFF and CAXPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAOFF and CAXPF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAOFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TAOFF | 100% | -13.73% | ||
CAXPF - TAOFF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FXRVF - TAOFF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NMG - TAOFF | 21% Poorly correlated | +18.06% | ||
MTAL - TAOFF | 8% Poorly correlated | -7.23% | ||
WCUFF - TAOFF | 8% Poorly correlated | -7.37% | ||
More |