MTB
Price
$195.60
Change
+$3.08 (+1.60%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
24.23B
90 days until earnings call
SNV
Price
$53.85
Change
+$0.98 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.74B
89 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTB vs SNV

Header iconMTB vs SNV Comparison
Open Charts MTB vs SNVBanner chart's image
M&T Bank
Price$195.60
Change+$3.08 (+1.60%)
Volume$1.75M
Capitalization24.23B
Synovus Financial
Price$53.85
Change+$0.98 (+1.85%)
Volume$2.76M
Capitalization5.74B
MTB vs SNV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTB vs. SNV commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTB is a Hold and SNV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MTB: $195.60 vs. SNV: $53.85)
Brand notoriety: MTB and SNV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTB: 147% vs. SNV: 263%
Market capitalization -- MTB: $24.23B vs. SNV: $5.74B
MTB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $24.23B. SNV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSNV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MTB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SNV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTB is a better buy in the long-term than SNV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNV’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SNV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTB is a better buy in the short-term than SNV.

Price Growth

MTB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.14% price change this week, while SNV (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

SNV is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTB($24.2B) has a higher market cap than SNV($5.74B). SNV has higher P/E ratio than MTB: SNV (11.34) vs MTB (9.07). SNV YTD gains are higher at: 6.849 vs. MTB (5.555). SNV has less debt than MTB: SNV (1.23B) vs MTB (13.2B). MTB has higher revenues than SNV: MTB (9.4B) vs SNV (2.16B).
MTBSNVMTB / SNV
Capitalization24.2B5.74B421%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.5556.84981%
P/E Ratio9.0711.3480%
Revenue9.4B2.16B436%
Total CashN/A605M-
Total Debt13.2B1.23B1,071%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTB vs SNV: Fundamental Ratings
MTB
SNV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2023
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3029
SMR RATING
1..100
610
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3387
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNV's Valuation (80) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (97). This means that SNV’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

SNV's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (30). This means that SNV’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SNV (10). This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to SNV’s over the last 12 months.

SNV's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (46). This means that SNV’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNV (87). This means that MTB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTBSNV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBJP76.430.58
+0.77%
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
IGI16.460.03
+0.18%
Western Asset Investment Grade Opportunity Trust Inc
GTO46.510.01
+0.02%
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
JXX25.85N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Transformational Gr ETF
MEDX27.47-0.38
-1.37%
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF