MTLHY vs NANX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTLHY is a Hold and NANX is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTLHY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNANX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MTLHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NANX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTLHY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NANX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MTLHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NANX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MTLHY (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -3.27% price change this week, while NANX (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -7.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.93%.
Reported Earning Dates
NANX is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.02% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| MTLHY | NANX | MTLHY / NANX | |
| Capitalization | 8.58B | 64.4M | 13,326% |
| EBITDA | 416B | -2.76M | -15,061,550% |
| Gain YTD | -15.796 | 314.167 | -5% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.85 | 97.09 | 13% |
| Revenue | 4.48T | 38.6M | 11,613,990% |
| Total Cash | 330B | 1.09M | 30,164,534% |
| Total Debt | 2.3T | 17.6M | 13,056,818% |
MTLHY | NANX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTLHY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NANX (86). This means that MTLHY’s stock grew significantly faster than NANX’s over the last 12 months.
NANX's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTLHY (100). This means that NANX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTLHY’s over the last 12 months.
NANX's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTLHY (100). This means that NANX’s stock grew significantly faster than MTLHY’s over the last 12 months.
NANX's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTLHY (78). This means that NANX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTLHY’s over the last 12 months.
MTLHY's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as NANX (21). This means that MTLHY’s stock grew similarly to NANX’s over the last 12 months.
| MTLHY | NANX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 54% | 18 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 7 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 90% |
MTLHY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MTLHY and ALB have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTLHY and ALB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTLHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTLHY | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| ALB - MTLHY | 21% Poorly correlated | -7.19% | ||
| TKCBY - MTLHY | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NGVT - MTLHY | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.12% | ||
| NDEKY - MTLHY | 19% Poorly correlated | -3.64% | ||
| NNCHY - MTLHY | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.52% | ||
More | ||||
NANX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NANX and NNOMF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NANX and NNOMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NANX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANX | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| NNOMF - NANX | 8% Poorly correlated | -5.01% | ||
| MXCHF - NANX | 5% Poorly correlated | -11.61% | ||
| MXCHY - NANX | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NMGX - NANX | -0% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
| MTLHY - NANX | -5% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
More | ||||