Advertisement
MTUM vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTUM is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MTUM | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RCS | 6.31 | 0.13 | +2.10% |
| PIMCO STRATEGIC Income FUND | |||
| RAYE | 24.45 | N/A | N/A |
| Rayliant Quantamental Emer Mkt Eq ETF | |||
| USRT | 55.57 | -0.04 | -0.07% |
| iShares Core US REIT ETF | |||
| BDVG | 11.58 | -0.04 | -0.39% |
| iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF | |||
| NKX | 11.80 | -0.05 | -0.42% |
| Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
MTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTUM has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTUM jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTUM | 100% | N/A | ||
| CDNS - MTUM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| ARES - MTUM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| SNPS - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| KLAC - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| AXP - MTUM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -0.92% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 89% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| ANSS - SNPS | 84% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| S - SNPS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| ORCL - SNPS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
More | ||||