MTUM vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTUM is a StrongBuy and SNPS is a Buy.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MTUM | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 74% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JPUS | 115.43 | 0.70 | +0.61% |
| JPMorgan Diversified Return US Eq ETF | |||
| HGER | 21.89 | 0.09 | +0.41% |
| Harbor Commodity All-Weather StrategyETF | |||
| NFRA | 54.49 | 0.22 | +0.41% |
| FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infras ETF | |||
| EFRA | 30.59 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Environmental Infras & IndstrETF | |||
| LABD | 6.82 | -0.01 | -0.15% |
| Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF | |||
MTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTUM has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTUM jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTUM | 100% | +1.29% | ||
| CDNS - MTUM | 81% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| SNPS - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| KLAC - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| ANET - MTUM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| VRT - MTUM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +1.54% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 85% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.90% | ||
| RIOT - SNPS | 53% Loosely correlated | +8.06% | ||
More | ||||