It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MURGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQBIEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MURGY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBIEY’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).
MURGY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.32% price change this week, while QBIEY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +3.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.87%.
MURGY is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
MURGY | QBIEY | MURGY / QBIEY | |
Capitalization | 52B | 15.8B | 329% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 34.574 | 19.623 | 176% |
P/E Ratio | 14.66 | 20.12 | 73% |
Revenue | 70.3B | 13.4B | 525% |
Total Cash | 5.82B | 833M | 698% |
Total Debt | 4.76B | 3.05B | 156% |
MURGY | QBIEY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QBIEY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as MURGY (44). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to MURGY’s over the last 12 months.
MURGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBIEY (41). This means that MURGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
QBIEY's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as MURGY (96). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to MURGY’s over the last 12 months.
MURGY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as QBIEY (54). This means that MURGY’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
MURGY's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as QBIEY (87). This means that MURGY’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
MURGY | QBIEY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago35% | 1 day ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago60% | 5 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 3 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MURGY has been closely correlated with HVRRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MURGY jumps, then HVRRY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MURGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MURGY | 100% | -0.85% | ||
HVRRY - MURGY | 76% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
SSREY - MURGY | 68% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
MURGF - MURGY | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.25% | ||
SCRYY - MURGY | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
EG - MURGY | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBIEY has been loosely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QBIEY jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBIEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QBIEY | 100% | +1.96% | ||
BNT - QBIEY | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
SMPNY - QBIEY | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
MURGY - QBIEY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
SPNT - QBIEY | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
TKOMY - QBIEY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
More |