MUX
Price
$8.21
Change
+$0.05 (+0.61%)
Updated
Apr 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
487.48M
22 days until earnings call
PAAS
Price
$27.46
Change
+$0.28 (+1.03%)
Updated
Apr 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.59B
22 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MUX vs PAAS

Header iconMUX vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts MUX vs PAASBanner chart's image
McEwen Mining
Price$8.21
Change+$0.05 (+0.61%)
Volume$3.6K
Capitalization487.48M
Pan American Silver
Price$27.46
Change+$0.28 (+1.03%)
Volume$20.33K
Capitalization5.59B
MUX vs PAAS Comparison Chart
Loading...
MUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MUX vs. PAAS commentary
Apr 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUX is a Buy and PAAS is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MUX: $8.16 vs. PAAS: $27.18)
Brand notoriety: MUX: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MUX: 83% vs. PAAS: 175%
Market capitalization -- MUX: $487.48M vs. PAAS: $5.59B
MUX [@Precious Metals] is valued at $487.48M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MUX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MUX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than MUX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MUX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MUX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the short-term than MUX.

Price Growth

MUX (@Precious Metals) experienced а +22.34% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +24.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +13.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUX is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+13.00% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($5.59B) has a higher market cap than MUX($487M). PAAS YTD gains are higher at: 34.988 vs. MUX (4.884). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. MUX (-73.95M). PAAS has higher revenues than MUX: PAAS (2.02B) vs MUX (166M).
MUXPAASMUX / PAAS
Capitalization487M5.59B9%
EBITDA-73.95M296M-25%
Gain YTD4.88434.98814%
P/E Ratio9.14N/A-
Revenue166M2.02B8%
Total Cash24.8MN/A-
Total Debt41.5MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MUX vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
MUX
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7412
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8151
SMR RATING
1..100
3987
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9538
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (17) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for MUX (86). This means that PAAS’s stock grew significantly faster than MUX’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MUX (81). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to MUX’s over the last 12 months.

MUX's SMR Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAAS (87). This means that MUX’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MUX (58). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to MUX’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUX (95). This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUXPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWH16.360.39
+2.44%
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
FCTR30.010.31
+1.06%
First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF
SATO13.610.14
+1.06%
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Eco ETF
IJAN31.550.26
+0.84%
Innovator Itnl Dvp Pwr Buff ETF™ Jan
IBDT25.020.08
+0.32%
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corp ETF

MUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUX has been closely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUX jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUX
1D Price
Change %
MUX100%
+2.51%
MAG - MUX
68%
Closely correlated
+5.47%
AG - MUX
67%
Closely correlated
+5.72%
CDE - MUX
66%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
EQX - MUX
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
PAAS - MUX
64%
Loosely correlated
+5.02%
More

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
+5.02%
MAG - PAAS
86%
Closely correlated
+5.47%
HL - PAAS
85%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
AG - PAAS
84%
Closely correlated
+5.72%
AEM - PAAS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
CDE - PAAS
81%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
More