Ad is loading...
MWCPX vs PUBAX
MWCPX vs PUBAX Comparison
Open Charts MWCPX vs PUBAX
TCW MetWest Unconstrained Bd Plan
Price$10.32
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
MWCPX vs PUBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MWCPX vs. PUBAX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MWCPX is a Hold and PUBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUBAX has more cash in the bank: 2.86B vs. MWCPX (2.72B). MWCPX pays higher dividends than PUBAX: MWCPX (6.53) vs PUBAX (4.37). MWCPX was incepted earlier than PUBAX: MWCPX (5 years) vs PUBAX (17 years). PUBAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than MWCPX (0.69). PUBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 528.00 vs. MWCPX (257.00). PUBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWCPX: PUBAX (1000) vs MWCPX (25000000). MWCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. PUBAX (7.45). PUBAX (16.21) and MWCPX (15.58) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MWCPX | PUBAX | MWCPX / PUBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.36 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.855 | 1.729 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000000 | 1000 | 2,500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 2.86B | 95% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.53 | 4.37 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.70 | 7.45 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.73 | 13.14 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.58 | 16.21 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.55 | - |