MXCHF
Price
$0.65
Change
+$0.03 (+4.84%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
SLSN
Price
$3.95
Change
-$0.23 (-5.50%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
64.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MXCHF vs SLSN

Header iconMXCHF vs SLSN Comparison
Open Charts MXCHF vs SLSNBanner chart's image
Orbia Advance Corp S A B
Price$0.65
Change+$0.03 (+4.84%)
Volume$31.43K
Capitalization4.35B
Solesence
Price$3.95
Change-$0.23 (-5.50%)
Volume$55.82K
Capitalization64.45M
MXCHF vs SLSN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MXCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLSN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MXCHF vs. SLSN commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCHF is a Hold and SLSN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MXCHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLSN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MXCHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLSN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MXCHF is a better buy in the short-term than SLSN.
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MXCHF($4.35B) has a higher market cap than SLSN($64.4M). SLSN has higher P/E ratio than MXCHF: SLSN (97.09) vs MXCHF (11.99). SLSN YTD gains are higher at: 61.686 vs. MXCHF (-10.712). MXCHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.18B vs. SLSN (-2.76M). MXCHF has more cash in the bank: 1.45B vs. SLSN (1.09M). SLSN has less debt than MXCHF: SLSN (17.6M) vs MXCHF (5B). MXCHF has higher revenues than SLSN: MXCHF (9.33B) vs SLSN (38.6M).
MXCHFSLSNMXCHF / SLSN
Capitalization4.35B64.4M6,748%
EBITDA1.18B-2.76M-42,578%
Gain YTD-10.71261.686-17%
P/E Ratio11.9997.0912%
Revenue9.33B38.6M24,176%
Total Cash1.45B1.09M132,267%
Total Debt5B17.6M28,409%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MXCHF vs SLSN: Fundamental Ratings
MXCHF
SLSN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10046
SMR RATING
1..100
7928
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9811
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MXCHF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLSN (89). This means that MXCHF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLSN’s over the last 12 months.

SLSN's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MXCHF (100). This means that SLSN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MXCHF’s over the last 12 months.

SLSN's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MXCHF (79). This means that SLSN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MXCHF’s over the last 12 months.

SLSN's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MXCHF (85). This means that SLSN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MXCHF’s over the last 12 months.

SLSN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MXCHF (98). This means that SLSN’s stock grew significantly faster than MXCHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MXCHFSLSN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MXCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLSN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YUEIY7.770.31
+4.16%
Yue Yuen Industrial (Holdings) Ltd
ACRFF53.10N/A
N/A
Accor SA Ltd.
KTHGF0.03N/A
N/A
Kantone Holdings Ltd.
SOME52.99N/A
N/A
Somerset Trust Holding Co.
PDLMF0.34N/A
N/A
Petra Diamonds Ltd

MXCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MXCHF and ARKAF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MXCHF and ARKAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MXCHF
1D Price
Change %
MXCHF100%
N/A
ARKAF - MXCHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDEKF - MXCHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NNCHY - MXCHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
NDEKY - MXCHF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
MXCHY - MXCHF
6%
Poorly correlated
+18.32%
More

SLSN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLSN and CNEY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLSN and CNEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLSN
1D Price
Change %
SLSN100%
-5.50%
CNEY - SLSN
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NNOMF - SLSN
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
ESI - SLSN
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
AVNT - SLSN
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
MXCHF - SLSN
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More