Advertisement
MXCHF vs SLSN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCHF is a Buy and SLSN is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MXCHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLSN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MXCHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SLSN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
| MXCHF | SLSN | MXCHF / SLSN | |
| Capitalization | 4.35B | 64.4M | 6,748% |
| EBITDA | 1.18B | -2.76M | -42,578% |
| Gain YTD | -1.370 | 77.650 | -2% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.99 | 97.09 | 12% |
| Revenue | 9.33B | 38.6M | 24,176% |
| Total Cash | 1.45B | 1.09M | 132,267% |
| Total Debt | 5B | 17.6M | 28,409% |
MXCHF | SLSN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 1 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MXCHF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLSN (90). This means that MXCHF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLSN’s over the last 12 months.
SLSN's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MXCHF (100). This means that SLSN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MXCHF’s over the last 12 months.
SLSN's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MXCHF (79). This means that SLSN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MXCHF’s over the last 12 months.
SLSN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MXCHF (56). This means that SLSN’s stock grew similarly to MXCHF’s over the last 12 months.
SLSN's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MXCHF (97). This means that SLSN’s stock grew significantly faster than MXCHF’s over the last 12 months.
| MXCHF | SLSN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
MXCHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MXCHF and ARKAF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MXCHF and ARKAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MXCHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MXCHF | 100% | +10.46% | ||
| ARKAF - MXCHF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NDEKF - MXCHF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NNCHY - MXCHF | 11% Poorly correlated | +15.94% | ||
| NDEKY - MXCHF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
| MXCHY - MXCHF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SLSN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SLSN and CNEY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLSN and CNEY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLSN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLSN | 100% | -2.25% | ||
| CNEY - SLSN | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| NNOMF - SLSN | 8% Poorly correlated | -4.27% | ||
| ESI - SLSN | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
| AVNT - SLSN | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MXCHF - SLSN | 5% Poorly correlated | +10.46% | ||
More | ||||