Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MXFAX vs PFFRX
MXFAX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXFAX vs. PFFRX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXFAX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.77B vs. MXFAX (1.55B). PFFRX (7.70) and MXFAX (7.48) have matching dividends . MXFAX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: MXFAX (21 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). MXFAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.70). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. MXFAX (26.00). PFFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than MXFAX: PFFRX (2500) vs MXFAX (15000). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.32 vs. MXFAX (6.27). PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 37.59 vs. MXFAX (33.16).
| MXFAX | PFFRX | MXFAX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.667 | 2.259 | 74% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 25000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 4.77B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.48 | 7.70 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.27 | 7.32 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.48 | 28.84 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.16 | 37.59 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.04 | 59.69 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers