Ad is loading...
MXIPX vs PACAX
MXIPX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MXIPX vs PACAX
Empower Conservative Profile L
Price$9.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets553.17M
MXIPX vs PACAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXIPX vs. PACAX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXIPX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MXIPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. PACAX (553M). PACAX pays higher dividends than MXIPX: PACAX (3.51) vs MXIPX (2.07). MXIPX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MXIPX (14 years) vs PACAX (31 years). MXIPX (1.10) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. MXIPX (26.00). MXIPX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.57 vs. MXIPX (3.82). MXIPX return over 5 years is better than : 12.62 vs. PACAX (7.96).
| MXIPX | PACAX | MXIPX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.00 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.00 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.435 | -1.631 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 553M | 237% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 3.51 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.82 | 4.57 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.97 | 4.64 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.62 | 7.96 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.00 | 13.25 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers