Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MXIPX vs PACAX
MXIPX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MXIPX vs PACAX
Empower Conservative Profile L
Price$9.46
Change-$0.05 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.82
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets563.09M
MXIPX vs PACAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXIPX vs. PACAX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXIPX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MXIPX has more cash in the bank: 1.38B vs. PACAX (563M). PACAX pays higher dividends than MXIPX: PACAX (3.25) vs MXIPX (2.05). MXIPX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MXIPX (14 years) vs PACAX (31 years). MXIPX (1.10) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. MXIPX (26.00). MXIPX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX (4.51) and MXIPX (4.44) have marching annual gain over last year. MXIPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.98 vs. PACAX (9.81).
| MXIPX | PACAX | MXIPX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.00 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.00 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.938 | 2.965 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 563M | 246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 3.25 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.44 | 4.51 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.64 | 18.77 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.98 | 9.81 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.95 | 20.12 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement