Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAAGX vs PXMAX
NAAGX vs PXMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAAGX vs PXMAX
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond C
Price$8.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.33M
Putnam MA Tax Exempt Income A
Price$8.71
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.51M
NAAGX vs PXMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAAGX vs. PXMAX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAAGX is a Hold and PXMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAAGX has more cash in the bank: 384M vs. PXMAX (252M). PXMAX pays higher dividends than NAAGX: PXMAX (3.00) vs NAAGX (2.48). NAAGX was incepted earlier than PXMAX: NAAGX (11 years) vs PXMAX (36 years). NAAGX (1.59) is less costly to investors than PXMAX (0.83). PXMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NAAGX (14.00). PXMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAAGX: PXMAX (0) vs NAAGX (2500). NAAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.89 vs. PXMAX (-3.38). NAAGX return over 5 years is better than : -5.83 vs. PXMAX (-10.26).
| NAAGX | PXMAX | NAAGX / PXMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.83 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.83 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.590 | -2.843 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 384M | 252M | 152% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 3.00 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.89 | -3.38 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.73 | -0.71 | -384% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.83 | -10.26 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.16 | -7.26 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers