Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs SSCCX
NAESX vs SSCCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs SSCCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$111.61
Change+$1.26 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
Saratoga Small Capitalization C
Price$0.36
Change+$0.01 (+2.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.94M
NAESX vs SSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. SSCCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and SSCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. SSCCX (5.94M). NAESX pays higher dividends than SSCCX: NAESX (1.35) vs SSCCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than SSCCX: NAESX (65 years) vs SSCCX (26 years). SSCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). SSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). SSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: SSCCX (250) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.13 vs. SSCCX (-66.98). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.20 vs. SSCCX (-84.65).
| NAESX | SSCCX | NAESX / SSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.91 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.91 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.086 | -5.405 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 5.94M | 2,491,163% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.13 | -66.98 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.63 | -78.40 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.20 | -84.65 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.08 | -94.81 | -101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers