Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NANC vs RECS
NANC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts NANC vs RECS
Unusual Whales Subversive Dem Trd ETF
Price$40.20
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
Volume$34.82K
Net Assets217.18M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.50
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
Volume$370.39K
Net Assets2.89B
NANC vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NANC vs. RECS commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NANC is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.89B vs. NANC (217M). NANC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: NANC (4.199) vs RECS (2.542). NANC was incepted earlier than RECS: NANC (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than NANC (0.74). NANC has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| NANC | RECS | NANC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.199 | 2.542 | 165% |
| Net Assets | 217M | 2.89B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.15 | 493% |
| Turnover | 62.00 | 49.00 | 127% |
| Yield | 0.20 | 0.69 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NANC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 66% | 29 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
NANC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NANC has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NANC jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NANC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANC | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| AMZN - NANC | 68% Closely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| MSFT - NANC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| CRM - NANC | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| NVDA - NANC | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| AAPL - NANC | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
More | ||||