Ad is loading...
NANC vs RECS
NANC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts NANC vs RECS
Unusual Whales Subversive Dem Trd ETF
Price$34.66
Change-$1.79 (-4.91%)
Volume$111.46K
Net Assets209.77M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$31.85
Change-$1.73 (-5.15%)
Volume$748.36K
Net Assets2.29B
NANC vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NANC vs. RECS commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NANC is a Buy and RECS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.29B vs. NANC (210M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than NANC: RECS (-8.001) vs NANC (-10.161). NANC was incepted earlier than RECS: NANC (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than NANC (0.74). RECS has a higher turnover NANC (44.00) vs NANC (44.00).
| NANC | RECS | NANC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -10.161 | -8.001 | 127% |
| Net Assets | 210M | 2.29B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.15 | 493% |
| Turnover | 44.00 | 49.00 | 90% |
| Yield | 0.22 | 0.73 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NANC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 64% | 8 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
NANC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NANC has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NANC jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NANC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANC | 100% | -4.91% | ||
| AMZN - NANC | 68% Closely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| MSFT - NANC | 67% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| CRM - NANC | 66% Loosely correlated | -6.01% | ||
| NVDA - NANC | 64% Loosely correlated | -7.81% | ||
| AAPL - NANC | 58% Loosely correlated | -9.25% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -5.15% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| CR - RECS | 65% Loosely correlated | -7.43% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -11.05% | ||
More | ||||