Ad is loading...
NANC vs RECS
NANC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts NANC vs RECS
Unusual Whales Subversive Dem Trd ETF
Price$39.42
Change+$0.23 (+0.59%)
Volume$56.52K
CapitalizationN/A
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.08
Change+$0.17 (+0.49%)
Volume$984.46K
CapitalizationN/A
NANC vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NANC vs. RECS commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NANC is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.54B vs. NANC (204M). NANC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: NANC (29.331) vs RECS (27.456). NANC was incepted earlier than RECS: NANC (2 years) vs RECS (5 years). RECS (45.00) and NANC (44.00) have matching turnover.
| NANC | RECS | NANC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 29.331 | 27.456 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 204M | 1.54B | 13% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 44.00 | 45.00 | 98% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.89 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NANC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 7 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
NANC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NANC has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NANC jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NANC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANC | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| AMZN - NANC | 68% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| MSFT - NANC | 67% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| CRM - NANC | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| NVDA - NANC | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.69% | ||
| AAPL - NANC | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
More | ||||