NATH
Price
$95.27
Change
-$1.08 (-1.12%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
397.01M
PBPB
Price
$8.08
Change
-$0.09 (-1.10%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
246.51M
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NATH vs PBPB

Header iconNATH vs PBPB Comparison
Open Charts NATH vs PBPBBanner chart's image
Nathan's Famous
Price$95.27
Change-$1.08 (-1.12%)
Volume$200
Capitalization397.01M
Potbelly
Price$8.08
Change-$0.09 (-1.10%)
Volume$2.88K
Capitalization246.51M
NATH vs PBPB Comparison Chart
Loading...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NATH vs. PBPB commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NATH is a StrongBuy and PBPB is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (NATH: $97.75 vs. PBPB: $8.17)
Brand notoriety: NATH and PBPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NATH: 63% vs. PBPB: 73%
Market capitalization -- NATH: $397.01M vs. PBPB: $246.51M
NATH [@Restaurants] is valued at $397.01M. PBPB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $246.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $228.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NATH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBPB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PBPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than PBPB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NATH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBPB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NATH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PBPB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBPB is a better buy in the short-term than NATH.

Price Growth

NATH (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.28% price change this week, while PBPB (@Restaurants) price change was +3.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

NATH is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

PBPB is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.19% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NATH($397M) has a higher market cap than PBPB($247M). NATH has higher P/E ratio than PBPB: NATH (16.74) vs PBPB (6.24). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 24.981 vs. PBPB (-13.270). NATH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38.2M vs. PBPB (21.3M). NATH has more cash in the bank: 23.7M vs. PBPB (11.7M). NATH has less debt than PBPB: NATH (56.8M) vs PBPB (155M). PBPB has higher revenues than NATH: PBPB (463M) vs NATH (146M).
NATHPBPBNATH / PBPB
Capitalization397M247M161%
EBITDA38.2M21.3M179%
Gain YTD24.981-13.270-188%
P/E Ratio16.746.24268%
Revenue146M463M32%
Total Cash23.7M11.7M203%
Total Debt56.8M155M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH vs PBPB: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
PBPB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2265
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1449
SMR RATING
1..100
4013
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NATH's Valuation (49) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBPB (88). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBPB (49). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's SMR Rating (13) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (40). This means that PBPB’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PBPB (63). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBPB (100). This means that NATH’s stock grew significantly faster than PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATHPBPB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAHMX14.06N/A
N/A
SA International Value
NWFAX28.75N/A
N/A
Nationwide A
CLTAX14.10N/A
N/A
Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation A
FMSHX23.80N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Shares R6
MMNYX9.38N/A
N/A
MassMutual Disciplined Gr Y

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
+0.69%
DIN - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
PZZA - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.61%
LOCO - NATH
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
PBPB - NATH
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
KRUS - NATH
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.06%
More

PBPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBPB has been loosely correlated with RRGB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBPB jumps, then RRGB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBPB
1D Price
Change %
PBPB100%
-0.73%
RRGB - PBPB
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
EAT - PBPB
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
RICK - PBPB
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
DRI - PBPB
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
FWRG - PBPB
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
More