Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAWCX vs TRZRX
NAWCX vs TRZRX Comparison
Open Charts NAWCX vs TRZRX
NAWCX vs TRZRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAWCX vs. TRZRX commentary
Jun 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAWCX is a StrongBuy and TRZRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZRX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. NAWCX (275M). TRZRX pays higher dividends than NAWCX: TRZRX (3.39) vs NAWCX (1.44). NAWCX was incepted earlier than TRZRX: NAWCX (33 years) vs TRZRX (6 years). NAWCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than TRZRX (0.65). NAWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. TRZRX (48.30). TRZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAWCX: TRZRX (0) vs NAWCX (1000). TRZRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.05 vs. NAWCX (8.63). TRZRX return over 5 years is better than : 51.38 vs. NAWCX (43.94).
| NAWCX | TRZRX | NAWCX / TRZRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.65 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.047 | 10.074 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275M | 10.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 3.39 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.63 | 31.05 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.53 | 56.44 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.94 | 51.38 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers