Ad is loading...
Compare predictions NAWCX vs TRZRX
NAWCX vs TRZRX Comparison
Open Charts NAWCX vs TRZRX
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAWCX vs TRZRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZRX has more cash in the bank: 9.03B vs. NAWCX (248M). NAWCX (3.02) and TRZRX (2.99) have matching dividends . NAWCX was incepted earlier than TRZRX: NAWCX (31 years) vs TRZRX (4 years). NAWCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than TRZRX (0.66). NAWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TRZRX (47.80). TRZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAWCX: TRZRX (0) vs NAWCX (1000). NAWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.30 vs. TRZRX (-2.93).
| NAWCX | TRZRX | NAWCX / TRZRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.01 | 16,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.66 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.131 | 1.039 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 248M | 9.03B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 2.99 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.30 | -2.93 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.65 | 21.06 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.34 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SIVR | 24.18 | 0.25 | +1.04% |
| abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | |||
| JANT | 29.87 | 0.09 | +0.32% |
| AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF | |||
| CGO | 8.96 | 0.01 | +0.11% |
| Calamos Global Total Return Fund | |||
| FLKR | 21.60 | -0.08 | -0.39% |
| Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | |||
| FXE | 100.62 | -0.80 | -0.79% |
| Invesco CurrencyShares® Euro Currency | |||