Ad is loading...
NBHAX vs RMFEX
NBHAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts NBHAX vs RMFEX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income A
Price$13.64
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets893.09M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.34
Change+$0.55 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.25B
NBHAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 96.2B vs. NBHAX (893M). NBHAX (1.69) and RMFEX (1.61) have matching dividends . NBHAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: NBHAX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). NBHAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NBHAX (28.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBHAX: RMFEX (250) vs NBHAX (1000). NBHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. RMFEX (1.70). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 52.96 vs. NBHAX (35.09).
| NBHAX | RMFEX | NBHAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.824 | -3.507 | -81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 893M | 96.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.61 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.35 | 1.70 | 315% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.83 | 8.21 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.09 | 52.96 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.25 | 57.52 | 35% |