Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHIX vs RMFCX
NBHIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NBHIX vs RMFCX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income I
Price$14.87
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.07B
NBHIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. NBHIX (1.01B). NBHIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NBHIX (2.03) vs RMFCX (1.27). NBHIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NBHIX (19 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NBHIX (0.73). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NBHIX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBHIX: RMFCX (250) vs NBHIX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. NBHIX (10.64). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.49 vs. NBHIX (35.52).
| NBHIX | RMFCX | NBHIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.240 | 11.347 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.27 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.64 | 11.38 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.08 | 30.87 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.52 | 60.49 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.95 | 81.82 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement