Ad is loading...
NBHIX vs RMFCX
NBHIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NBHIX vs RMFCX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income I
Price$13.65
Change+$0.12 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets883.49M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
NBHIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. NBHIX (883M). NBHIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NBHIX (2.04) vs RMFCX (1.34). NBHIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NBHIX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NBHIX (0.73). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NBHIX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBHIX: RMFCX (250) vs NBHIX (1000000). NBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.53 vs. RMFCX (3.42). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. NBHIX (34.68).
| NBHIX | RMFCX | NBHIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.301 | -3.342 | -69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 883M | 96.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 1.34 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 3.42 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.06 | 5.55 | -91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.68 | 48.78 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.36 | 54.35 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...