Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBMAX vs PMATX
NBMAX vs PMATX Comparison
Open Charts NBMAX vs PMATX
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets412.52M
Putnam MA Tax Exempt Income R6
Price$8.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.93M
NBMAX vs PMATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBMAX vs. PMATX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBMAX is a Hold and PMATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMAX has more cash in the bank: 413M vs. PMATX (249M). NBMAX pays higher dividends than PMATX: NBMAX (3.56) vs PMATX (3.29). NBMAX was incepted earlier than PMATX: NBMAX (39 years) vs PMATX (7 years). NBMAX (0.60) is less costly to investors than PMATX (0.56). PMATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NBMAX (14.00). PMATX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMAX: PMATX (0) vs NBMAX (100000). NBMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.35 vs. PMATX (-4.79). NBMAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.35 vs. PMATX (-12.32).
| NBMAX | PMATX | NBMAX / PMATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.56 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.56 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.153 | -3.838 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 413M | 249M | 166% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 3.29 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.35 | -4.79 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.23 | -4.02 | -55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.35 | -12.32 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers