Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBMAX vs PXMAX
NBMAX vs PXMAX Comparison
Open Charts NBMAX vs PXMAX
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.87
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.36M
Putnam MA Tax Exempt Income A
Price$8.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.44M
NBMAX vs PXMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBMAX vs. PXMAX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBMAX is a Hold and PXMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMAX has more cash in the bank: 411M vs. PXMAX (251M). NBMAX pays higher dividends than PXMAX: NBMAX (3.62) vs PXMAX (3.07). NBMAX was incepted earlier than PXMAX: NBMAX (39 years) vs PXMAX (36 years). PXMAX (0.83) is less costly to investors than NBMAX (0.60). PXMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. NBMAX (14.00). PXMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMAX: PXMAX (0) vs NBMAX (100000). NBMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.85 vs. PXMAX (-4.00). NBMAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.97 vs. PXMAX (-11.83).
| NBMAX | PXMAX | NBMAX / PXMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.83 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.83 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.189 | -2.719 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 411M | 251M | 164% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 3.07 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.85 | -4.00 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.27 | -2.79 | -117% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.97 | -11.83 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.35 | -7.33 | -114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers