Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBMAX vs PXMAX
NBMAX vs PXMAX Comparison
Open Charts NBMAX vs PXMAX
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.92
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.33M
Putnam MA Tax Exempt Income A
Price$8.71
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.51M
NBMAX vs PXMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBMAX vs. PXMAX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBMAX is a Hold and PXMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMAX has more cash in the bank: 384M vs. PXMAX (252M). NBMAX pays higher dividends than PXMAX: NBMAX (3.54) vs PXMAX (3.00). NBMAX was incepted earlier than PXMAX: NBMAX (39 years) vs PXMAX (36 years). PXMAX (0.83) is less costly to investors than NBMAX (0.59). PXMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NBMAX (14.00). PXMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMAX: PXMAX (0) vs NBMAX (100000). NBMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.85 vs. PXMAX (-3.38). NBMAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.09 vs. PXMAX (-10.26).
| NBMAX | PXMAX | NBMAX / PXMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.83 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.83 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.246 | -2.843 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 384M | 252M | 152% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.54 | 3.00 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | -3.38 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.83 | -0.71 | -818% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.09 | -10.26 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.04 | -7.26 | -124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers