Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBMAX vs VMATX
NBMAX vs VMATX Comparison
Open Charts NBMAX vs VMATX
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.92
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.33M
Vanguard MA Tax-Exempt I
Price$9.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.83B
NBMAX vs VMATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBMAX vs. VMATX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBMAX is a Hold and VMATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMATX has more cash in the bank: 2.83B vs. NBMAX (384M). VMATX (3.61) and NBMAX (3.54) have matching dividends . NBMAX was incepted earlier than VMATX: NBMAX (39 years) vs VMATX (27 years). NBMAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VMATX (0.09). VMATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. NBMAX (14.00). VMATX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMAX: VMATX (3000) vs NBMAX (100000). NBMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.85 vs. VMATX (-3.94). NBMAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.99 vs. VMATX (-13.12).
| NBMAX | VMATX | NBMAX / VMATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.09 | 656% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.09 | 656% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.246 | -3.561 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 3000 | 3,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 384M | 2.83B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.54 | 3.61 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | -3.94 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.06 | -0.87 | -694% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.99 | -13.12 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.04 | -8.37 | -108% |