Ad is loading...
NBMBX vs TRQZX
NBMBX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NBMBX vs TRQZX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Adv
Price$16.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$95.74
Change+$0.29 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.04B
NBMBX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. NBMBX (1.83B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NBMBX: TRQZX (0.67) vs NBMBX (0.00). NBMBX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NBMBX (29 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). NBMBX (1.20) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NBMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). NBMBX (0) and TRQZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.91 vs. TRQZX (-9.04). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 12.78 vs. NBMBX (7.77).
| NBMBX | TRQZX | NBMBX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.61 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.954 | -4.944 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 27B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.67 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.91 | -9.04 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.35 | 8.27 | 246% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.77 | 12.78 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.06 | N/A | - |