Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNAX vs RERFX
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNAX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$15.45
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.39M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$60.76
Change+$0.13 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.48B
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNAX vs. RERFX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNAX is a StrongBuy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. NBNAX (227M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNAX: RERFX (0.90) vs NBNAX (0.78). NBNAX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNAX (18 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: RERFX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). NBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.55 vs. RERFX (5.58). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.97 vs. RERFX (18.34).
| NBNAX | RERFX | NBNAX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.52 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.52 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.582 | 13.231 | 148% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 134B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.90 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.55 | 5.58 | 243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.51 | 30.71 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.97 | 18.34 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.27 | 29.06 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement