NBYCF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.3M
SCCO
Price
$78.39
Change
-$8.34 (-9.62%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
82.35B
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NBYCF vs SCCO

Header iconNBYCF vs SCCO Comparison
Open Charts NBYCF vs SCCOBanner chart's image
Niobay Metals
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$1.58K
Capitalization5.3M
Southern Copper
Price$78.39
Change-$8.34 (-9.62%)
Volume$2.94M
Capitalization82.35B
NBYCF vs SCCO Comparison Chart
Loading...
SCCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBYCF vs. SCCO commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBYCF is a Hold and SCCO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NBYCF: $0.05 vs. SCCO: $78.39)
Brand notoriety: NBYCF and SCCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBYCF: 10% vs. SCCO: 189%
Market capitalization -- NBYCF: $5.3M vs. SCCO: $82.35B
NBYCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $5.3M. SCCO’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $82.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBYCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCCO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NBYCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCCO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCCO is a better buy in the long-term than NBYCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCCO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SCCO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

NBYCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +13.80% price change this week, while SCCO (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -16.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -5.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCCO is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-5.65% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCCO($82.4B) has a higher market cap than NBYCF($5.3M). NBYCF (34.84) and SCCO (34.09) have similar P/E ratio . NBYCF YTD gains are higher at: 27.322 vs. SCCO (-12.723). SCCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.12B vs. NBYCF (-4.43M). SCCO has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. NBYCF (4M). NBYCF has less debt than SCCO: NBYCF (48.2K) vs SCCO (7.03B). SCCO has higher revenues than NBYCF: SCCO (9.9B) vs NBYCF (0).
NBYCFSCCONBYCF / SCCO
Capitalization5.3M82.4B0%
EBITDA-4.43M5.12B-0%
Gain YTD27.322-12.723-215%
P/E Ratio34.8434.09102%
Revenue09.9B-
Total Cash4M1.75B0%
Total Debt48.2K7.03B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBYCF vs SCCO: Fundamental Ratings
NBYCF
SCCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5093
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10028
SMR RATING
1..100
9425
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4380
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4190
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCCO's Valuation (11) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBYCF (74) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

SCCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBYCF (100) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew significantly faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

SCCO's SMR Rating (25) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBYCF (94) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew significantly faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCCO (80) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that NBYCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCCO’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCCO (90) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that NBYCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SCCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYVFX8.12-0.25
-2.99%
Royce Small-Cap Value Service
PSKCX37.28-2.01
-5.12%
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth C
CTCSX29.19-1.65
-5.35%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth C
AMRMX51.67-3.06
-5.59%
American Funds American Mutual A
FSGAX38.20-2.48
-6.10%
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Adv

NBYCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBYCF and RIO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBYCF and RIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBYCF
1D Price
Change %
NBYCF100%
+15.06%
RIO - NBYCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.44%
BHP - NBYCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.49%
SCCO - NBYCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.62%
VALE - NBYCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.68%
FCX - NBYCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-13.01%
More

SCCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCCO has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCCO jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCCO
1D Price
Change %
SCCO100%
-9.62%
FCX - SCCO
84%
Closely correlated
-13.01%
TECK - SCCO
83%
Closely correlated
-12.09%
HBM - SCCO
79%
Closely correlated
-11.81%
ERO - SCCO
76%
Closely correlated
-11.91%
LUNMF - SCCO
76%
Closely correlated
-11.52%
More