NCLH vs SCI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCLH is a StrongSell and SCI is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NCLH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- NCLH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NCLH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NCLH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SCI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NCLH (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а -4.62% price change this week, while SCI (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +0.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
NCLH is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
SCI is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Services (+0.67% weekly)Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
| NCLH | SCI | NCLH / SCI | |
| Capitalization | 8.91B | 10.9B | 82% |
| EBITDA | 1.77B | 1.26B | 141% |
| Gain YTD | 29.940 | 26.284 | 114% |
| P/E Ratio | 53.69 | 20.78 | 258% |
| Revenue | 8.55B | 4.1B | 209% |
| Total Cash | 402M | 222M | 181% |
| Total Debt | 14.1B | 4.8B | 294% |
NCLH | SCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCI's Valuation (53) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as NCLH (70) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that SCI’s stock grew similarly to NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
SCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCLH (100) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that SCI’s stock grew significantly faster than NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
NCLH's SMR Rating (16) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as SCI (31) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that NCLH’s stock grew similarly to SCI’s over the last 12 months.
NCLH's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCI (41) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that NCLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCI’s over the last 12 months.
SCI's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCLH (95) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that SCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
| NCLH | SCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 16 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 43% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ZSL | 37.75 | 0.99 | +2.69% |
| ProShares UltraShort Silver | |||
| IWD | 193.92 | 0.66 | +0.34% |
| iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | |||
| PEY | 22.10 | 0.05 | +0.23% |
| Invesco High Yield Eq Div Achiev™ ETF | |||
| HEGD | 22.62 | N/A | +0.02% |
| Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF | |||
| XBAP | 33.86 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
| Innovator US Eq Acltd 9 Bfr ETFTM April | |||
NCLH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCLH has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NCLH jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NCLH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCLH | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| CCL - NCLH | 83% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| RCL - NCLH | 71% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| LIND - NCLH | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| BKNG - NCLH | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| ABNB - NCLH | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
More | ||||
SCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCI has been loosely correlated with CSV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCI jumps, then CSV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCI | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| CSV - SCI | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| SABR - SCI | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| TNL - SCI | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| MCW - SCI | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| NCLH - SCI | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
More | ||||