Ad is loading...
NDVBX vs SSGSX
NDVBX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NDVBX vs SSGSX
MFS New Discovery Value B
Price$14.89
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.43
Change-$0.26 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
NDVBX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDVBX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDVBX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.38B vs. NDVBX (2.65B). NDVBX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NDVBX (0.77) vs SSGSX (0.52). NDVBX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NDVBX (14 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). NDVBX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NDVBX (34.00). NDVBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NDVBX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). NDVBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.56 vs. SSGSX (-12.70). NDVBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.99 vs. SSGSX (25.11).
| NDVBX | SSGSX | NDVBX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.26 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.892 | -12.923 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 5.38B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.52 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.56 | -12.70 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.55 | -13.46 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.99 | 25.11 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.97 | 3.15 | 476% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers