Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDVCX vs SSGSX
NDVCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NDVCX vs SSGSX
MFS New Discovery Value C
Price$16.37
Change+$0.13 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.78B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.37
Change+$0.32 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.7B
NDVCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDVCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDVCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.7B vs. NDVCX (2.78B). NDVCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NDVCX (0.84) vs SSGSX (0.51). NDVCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NDVCX (14 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). NDVCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NDVCX (34.00). NDVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NDVCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). NDVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.09 vs. SSGSX (-9.42). NDVCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.98 vs. SSGSX (22.62).
| NDVCX | SSGSX | NDVCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.147 | -2.972 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 5.7B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.51 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.09 | -9.42 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.92 | -2.83 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.98 | 22.62 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.77 | 17.56 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement