Ad is loading...
NDVCX vs SSGSX
NDVCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NDVCX vs SSGSX
MFS New Discovery Value C
Price$14.75
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.43
Change-$0.26 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
NDVCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDVCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDVCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.38B vs. NDVCX (2.65B). NDVCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NDVCX (0.86) vs SSGSX (0.52). NDVCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NDVCX (14 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). NDVCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NDVCX (34.00). NDVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NDVCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). NDVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.62 vs. SSGSX (-12.70). NDVCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.59 vs. SSGSX (25.11).
| NDVCX | SSGSX | NDVCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.26 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.930 | -12.923 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 5.38B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.52 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.62 | -12.70 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.77 | -13.46 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.59 | 25.11 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.21 | 3.15 | 452% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers