NE
Price
$42.40
Change
+$0.96 (+2.32%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
6.77B
92 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SDRL
Price
$44.84
Change
+$1.60 (+3.70%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.8B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NE vs SDRL

NE vs SDRL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Noble Corporation (NE) vs. Seadrill Limited (SDRL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • NE commands a substantially larger contract backlog of $7.5 billion, compared to SDRL's $2.5 billion, reflecting a wider revenue runway and deeper customer relationships across multiple basins.
  • Noble Corporation returned to profitability in the fourth quarter of 2025 with net income of $87 million, while Seadrill Limited continued to report net losses, underscoring divergent earnings momentum.
  • Noble maintains a consistent $0.50 per share quarterly dividend and has returned approximately $1.3 billion to shareholders since late 2022; Seadrill does not currently pay a dividend.
  • Seadrill carries a leaner balance sheet with net debt of $260 million and $625 million in gross principal debt, while Noble holds $2 billion in total debt against $471 million in cash.
  • Both companies are positioning for a tightening deepwater rig market anticipated in 2027, but Noble's fleet diversification across floaters and jackups offers broader exposure, while Seadrill's focused deepwater fleet provides concentrated upside.
  • Institutional sentiment has been mixed for both names, with some prominent funds exiting positions in recent quarters, citing a slower-than-expected offshore spending recovery.

Introduction

Investors tracking the offshore drilling sector frequently encounter two prominent names: NE (Noble Corporation plc) and SDRL (Seadrill Limited). Both companies operate high-specification drilling rigs serving major oil and gas producers worldwide, yet their financial profiles, strategic priorities, and market positioning differ considerably. With the offshore drilling industry navigating a transitional period—characterized by gradually tightening rig supply, recovering dayrates, and cautious upstream capital spending—understanding how these two contractors compare has become increasingly relevant for energy-sector investors, traders monitoring cyclical momentum, and those evaluating relative value within the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This comparison examines each company's recent performance, business fundamentals, and AI-driven analytical perspective.

NE Overview and Recent Performance

Noble Corporation plc is a Houston-based offshore drilling contractor with a heritage dating back to 1921. The company operates a diversified fleet of mobile offshore drilling units spanning both floaters (drillships and semi-submersibles) and jackup rigs, serving super-majors, national oil companies (NOCs), and independent operators across key basins including the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, South America, West Africa, and the North Sea. Noble meaningfully expanded its scale and capabilities through its 2022 merger with Maersk Drilling, creating one of the industry's largest and most modern fleets.

In recent weeks, Noble reported full-year 2025 results that highlighted both resilience and transitional headwinds. The company posted total revenue of approximately $3.25 billion for the year, with Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) landing in the upper half of its original guidance range. Notably, Noble added roughly $1.3 billion in new contract awards since its prior fleet status report, lifting its total backlog to $7.5 billion. Fourth-quarter net income reached $87 million, a marked improvement from a $21 million net loss in the prior quarter, though Adjusted EBITDA declined sequentially to $232 million on lower fleet utilization. Marketed fleet utilization across 24 floaters stood at 62%, while jackup utilization improved to 68%. The company also completed the divestiture of five jackup rigs for $360 million, sharpening its focus on ultra-harsh environment jackups and high-specification drillships. Noble declared its recurring $0.50 per share quarterly dividend, reinforcing a shareholder-return commitment that has now delivered approximately $1.3 billion in cumulative capital returns since the fourth quarter of 2022.

SDRL Overview and Recent Performance

Seadrill Limited, headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda, is a pure-play deepwater drilling contractor operating a modern fleet of drillships and semi-submersible rigs. The company emerged from financial restructuring with a markedly cleaner balance sheet and has since concentrated on securing multi-year contract coverage across the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, Brazil, Angola, and Southeast Asia. Seadrill's fleet, while smaller than Noble's, is generally younger and tailored for high-efficiency deepwater operations.

Seadrill's recent financial disclosures point to a company executing commercially while continuing to work through earnings headwinds. For full-year 2025, the company reported a net loss of $77 million on total operating revenues of approximately $1.37 billion, with Adjusted EBITDA of $353 million. Fourth-quarter results showed a modest net loss of $10 million and Adjusted EBITDA of $88 million, roughly flat sequentially. On the commercial front, Seadrill secured contract awards across seven rigs during the quarter, adding approximately $0.5 billion to its contract backlog, which now stands at $2.5 billion. Key wins included a 440-day contract for the West Capella with PTTEP in Malaysia and a one-year extension for the West Saturn with Equinor in Brazil. The company's balance sheet remains relatively conservative, with gross principal debt of $625 million, cash of $365 million, and net debt of $260 million. However, free cash flow generation has been constrained—the company generated just $9 million in free cash flow during the third quarter—and Seadrill does not currently distribute a dividend, distinguishing it from dividend-paying peers.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking to navigate the complexities of comparing stocks like NE and SDRL, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated gateway into algorithmic trading. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and other instruments. However, only the strongest-performing and most market-appropriate bots earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots span a broad spectrum of trading styles—ranging from short-term momentum strategies to longer-duration trend-following approaches—and each comes with its own track record of performance statistics, win rates, and risk parameters. Some bots may show annualized returns in the double digits, while others prioritize consistency and drawdown control. By exploring this curated selection, traders can identify which AI-driven strategies are currently aligned with market conditions and may be best suited to their own trading objectives. Discover the bots shaping today's markets at the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, Noble and Seadrill reveal a study in scale, strategy, and financial positioning. Noble's $7.5 billion backlog dwarfs Seadrill's $2.5 billion, granting Noble far greater revenue visibility through the end of the decade. Noble also benefits from fleet diversification: its 24 floaters and 11 jackups span both deepwater and shallow-water markets, while Seadrill's roughly 16-rig fleet is concentrated almost entirely in deepwater floaters. This gives Noble a broader earnings base but also exposes it to a wider set of operational variables.

On profitability, the contrast is stark. Noble has generated positive net income in three of the past four quarters and pays a consistent dividend yielding approximately 6–7% at recent prices. Seadrill, by contrast, posted net losses in each quarter of 2025 and offers no dividend. However, Seadrill's balance sheet is notably lighter, with net debt of just $260 million versus Noble's net debt position of approximately $1.53 billion. This lower leverage could provide Seadrill with greater financial flexibility if the offshore recovery accelerates.

Both companies face similar macro catalysts: a tightening supply of high-specification rigs, rising global deepwater tender activity, and the potential for dayrate inflection as legacy contracts roll over. Noble's management has explicitly pointed to 2027 backlog already eclipsing 2026 levels, while Seadrill's CEO has described 2026 as a year of strengthening fundamentals leading into a more robust 2027. Risk factors for both include the pace of upstream capital spending by major oil companies, oil price volatility, and the possibility that the anticipated utilization recovery takes longer to materialize than current consensus suggests.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, financial stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely favor NE in the current market environment. Noble's combination of a $7.5 billion backlog, positive trailing earnings, consistent dividend distributions, and active fleet optimization through asset sales creates a more stable and predictable return profile. While SDRL offers a compelling lean-balance-sheet story and meaningful upside optionality should deepwater dayrates inflect sharply, its persistent net losses and more limited backlog coverage introduce greater uncertainty. The AI's probabilistic assessment would likely weigh Noble's broader revenue base and demonstrated capital-return discipline more favorably in a market environment where visibility and consistency remain at a premium. This assessment reflects a probabilistic evaluation of current fundamentals and trend signals rather than a definitive prediction, and market conditions may shift as the offshore cycle evolves.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NE vs. SDRL commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NE is a StrongBuy and SDRL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (NE: $42.40 vs. SDRL: $44.84)
Brand notoriety: NE and SDRL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Contract Drilling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NE: 62% vs. SDRL: 79%
Market capitalization -- NE: $6.77B vs. SDRL: $2.8B
NE [@Contract Drilling] is valued at $6.77B. SDRL’s [@Contract Drilling] market capitalization is $2.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Contract Drilling] industry ranges from $6.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Contract Drilling] industry is $3.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSDRL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SDRL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NE is a better buy in the long-term than SDRL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NE’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SDRL’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NE’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SDRL’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NE and SDRL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NE (@Contract Drilling) experienced а -1.99% price change this week, while SDRL (@Contract Drilling) price change was -0.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

NE is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

SDRL is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Contract Drilling (-0.66% weekly)

The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NE($6.77B) has a higher market cap than SDRL($2.8B). SDRL has higher P/E ratio than NE: SDRL (92.91) vs NE (45.11). NE YTD gains are higher at: 53.448 vs. SDRL (29.595). NE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 929M vs. SDRL (279M). NE has more cash in the bank: 456M vs. SDRL (304M). SDRL has less debt than NE: SDRL (631M) vs NE (1.89B). NE has higher revenues than SDRL: NE (3.07B) vs SDRL (1.46B).
NESDRLNE / SDRL
Capitalization6.77B2.8B241%
EBITDA929M279M333%
Gain YTD53.44829.595181%
P/E Ratio45.1192.9149%
Revenue3.07B1.46B210%
Total Cash456M304M150%
Total Debt1.89B631M299%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NE vs SDRL: Fundamental Ratings
NE
SDRL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1637
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6041
SMR RATING
1..100
8893
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3066

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NE's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SDRL (86) in the Contract Drilling industry. This means that NE’s stock grew significantly faster than SDRL’s over the last 12 months.

SDRL's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as NE (60) in the null industry. This means that SDRL’s stock grew similarly to NE’s over the last 12 months.

NE's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as SDRL (93) in the Contract Drilling industry. This means that NE’s stock grew similarly to SDRL’s over the last 12 months.

NE's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SDRL (42) in the Contract Drilling industry. This means that NE’s stock grew similarly to SDRL’s over the last 12 months.

SDRL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as NE (3) in the null industry. This means that SDRL’s stock grew similarly to NE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NESDRL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SDRL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NULG112.130.29
+0.26%
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
CVRT47.400.10
+0.21%
Calamos Convertible Equity Alt ETF
MYCO24.00-0.05
-0.19%
State Street® My2035 Corporate Bond ETF
KSTR23.54-0.31
-1.30%
KraneShares CHN Tech & Semicon STAR50ETF
MSTP12.33-1.11
-8.27%
GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF

SDRL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SDRL has been closely correlated with NE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SDRL jumps, then NE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SDRL
1D Price
Change %
SDRL100%
+3.70%
NE - SDRL
75%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
RIG - SDRL
69%
Closely correlated
+4.72%
VAL - SDRL
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.78%
BORR - SDRL
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
PDS - SDRL
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
More