Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAMX vs RMFCX
NEAMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NEAMX vs RMFCX
Neiman Large Cap Value A
Price$33.97
Change+$0.10 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.45M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
NEAMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAMX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. NEAMX (38.4M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than NEAMX: RMFCX (1.27) vs NEAMX (0.87). NEAMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NEAMX (13 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). NEAMX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NEAMX (8.32). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NEAMX: RMFCX (250) vs NEAMX (2500). NEAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. RMFCX (11.38). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.49 vs. NEAMX (48.48).
| NEAMX | RMFCX | NEAMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.91 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.91 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.763 | 11.347 | 77% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.4M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.27 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | 11.38 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.59 | 30.87 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.48 | 60.49 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.51 | 81.82 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement