Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAMX vs RMFCX
NEAMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NEAMX vs RMFCX
Neiman Large Cap Value A
Price$32.52
Change+$0.24 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.48M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
NEAMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAMX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. NEAMX (36.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than NEAMX: RMFCX (1.31) vs NEAMX (1.07). NEAMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NEAMX (13 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). NEAMX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NEAMX (12.13). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NEAMX: RMFCX (250) vs NEAMX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. NEAMX (6.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. NEAMX (35.02).
| NEAMX | RMFCX | NEAMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.91 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.91 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.032 | 5.919 | 51% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.31 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.14 | 9.01 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.72 | 17.82 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.02 | 51.66 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.31 | 70.47 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement