Ad is loading...
NFACX vs RNPEX
NFACX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts NFACX vs RNPEX
Neuberger Berman Focus C
Price$28.60
Change+$0.12 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets699.38M
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$62.18
Change+$0.13 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.81B
NFACX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFACX vs. RNPEX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFACX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. NFACX (699M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than NFACX: RNPEX (0.55) vs NFACX (0.00). NFACX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: NFACX (15 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). NFACX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). NFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFACX: RNPEX (250) vs NFACX (1000). NFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.48 vs. RNPEX (5.60). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 46.11 vs. NFACX (23.36).
| NFACX | RNPEX | NFACX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.76 | 246% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.76 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.838 | 2.085 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 699M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.48 | 5.60 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.90 | 28.15 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.36 | 46.11 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.11 | 63.18 | -78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...