Ad is loading...
NFACX vs RNPFX
NFACX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts NFACX vs RNPFX
Neuberger Berman Focus C
Price$28.60
Change+$0.12 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets699.38M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$63.40
Change+$0.14 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.81B
NFACX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFACX vs. RNPFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFACX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. NFACX (699M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than NFACX: RNPFX (0.82) vs NFACX (0.00). NFACX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: NFACX (15 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). NFACX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). NFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFACX: RNPFX (250) vs NFACX (1000). NFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.48 vs. RNPFX (6.00). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.99 vs. NFACX (23.36).
| NFACX | RNPFX | NFACX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.46 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.46 | 426% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.838 | 2.192 | -38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 699M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.82 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.48 | 6.00 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.90 | 29.14 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.36 | 47.99 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.11 | 65.80 | -75% |