Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFACX vs RPEBX
NFACX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts NFACX vs RPEBX
Neuberger Berman Focus C
Price$33.17
Change+$0.51 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets801.56M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$69.68
Change+$1.03 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.47B
NFACX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFACX vs. RPEBX commentary
Aug 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFACX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. NFACX (802M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than NFACX: RPEBX (0.12) vs NFACX (0.00). NFACX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: NFACX (15 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). NFACX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RPEBX (1.21). NFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RPEBX (24.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFACX: RPEBX (250) vs NFACX (1000). NFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.27 vs. RPEBX (12.67). RPEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.40 vs. NFACX (20.66).
| NFACX | RPEBX | NFACX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.21 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.21 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.777 | 15.422 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 802M | 159B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.27 | 12.67 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.16 | 39.36 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.66 | 33.40 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.45 | 98.33 | -34% |