Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEPX vs RGACX
NFEPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NFEPX vs RGACX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
Price$21.14
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$80.31
Change+$0.41 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.6B
NFEPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEPX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEPX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NFEPX (1.27B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NFEPX: RGACX (0.07) vs NFEPX (0.00). NFEPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NFEPX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NFEPX (0.86). NFEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEPX: RGACX (250) vs NFEPX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.80 vs. NFEPX (5.71). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.61 vs. NFEPX (-5.42).
| NFEPX | RGACX | NFEPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.129 | 11.557 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.71 | 9.80 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.89 | 57.37 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.42 | 42.61 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.05 | 77.97 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement