Analysis and predictions NFEPX vs RGACX
NFEPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NFEPX vs RGACX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
Price$14.57
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$57.24
Change+$0.26 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NFEPX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 28, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEPX is a Sell and RGACX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 221B vs. NFEPX (1.08B). NFEPX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . NFEPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NFEPX (26 years) vs RGACX (21 years). RGACX (0.95) is less costly to investors than NFEPX (0.86). NFEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGACX (30.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEPX: RGACX (250) vs NFEPX (2000). NFEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.69 vs. RGACX (15.78). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 7.47 vs. NFEPX (-12.63).
| NFEPX | RGACX | NFEPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.95 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.95 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.336 | 18.977 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 221B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.69 | 15.78 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.74 | 2.57 | -1,273% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.63 | 7.47 | -169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.65 | 110.60 | 63% |