Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEPX vs RGAFX
NFEPX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NFEPX vs RGAFX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
Price$20.78
Change-$0.19 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$82.03
Change+$0.51 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets317.85B
NFEPX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEPX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEPX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 318B vs. NFEPX (1.26B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NFEPX: RGAFX (0.57) vs NFEPX (0.00). NFEPX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NFEPX (28 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NFEPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NFEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEPX: RGAFX (250) vs NFEPX (2000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.86 vs. NFEPX (7.10). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.06 vs. NFEPX (-2.92).
| NFEPX | RGAFX | NFEPX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.34 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.34 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.451 | 10.535 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 318B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | 11.86 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.98 | 59.65 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.92 | 50.06 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.19 | 86.34 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement