Compare predictions NFEPX vs RGEBX
NFEPX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NFEPX vs RGEBX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
Price$14.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$57.24
Change-$0.16 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEPX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NFEPX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 30, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEPX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 223B vs. NFEPX (1.09B). NFEPX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NFEPX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NFEPX (26 years) vs RGEBX (9 years). RGEBX (1.10) is less costly to investors than NFEPX (0.86). NFEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (30.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEPX: RGEBX (250) vs NFEPX (2000). NFEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.37 vs. RGEBX (16.25). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.36 vs. NFEPX (-11.91).
| NFEPX | RGEBX | NFEPX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.10 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.10 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.261 | 19.624 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 223B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.37 | 16.25 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | -33.12 | 1.25 | -2,639% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.91 | 7.36 | -162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS