Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFFCX vs PFFRX
NFFCX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFFCX vs. PFFRX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFFCX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.97B vs. NFFCX (1.6B). PFFRX pays higher dividends than NFFCX: PFFRX (7.49) vs NFFCX (7.05). NFFCX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: NFFCX (14 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). NFFCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.70). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. NFFCX (24.00). NFFCX (2500) and PFFRX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. NFFCX (6.66). PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 37.57 vs. NFFCX (34.94).
| NFFCX | PFFRX | NFFCX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.70 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.70 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.950 | 3.701 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 4.97B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 7.49 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 7.69 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.52 | 28.74 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.94 | 37.57 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.61 | 61.41 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement