Ad is loading...
NFFCX vs TRIZX
NFFCX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.04B vs. NFFCX (1.48B). TRIZX pays higher dividends than NFFCX: TRIZX (8.63) vs NFFCX (7.49). NFFCX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: NFFCX (14 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). NFFCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.62). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. NFFCX (24.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFFCX: TRIZX (0) vs NFFCX (2500). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.19 vs. NFFCX (5.86). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 45.19 vs. NFFCX (38.69).
| NFFCX | TRIZX | NFFCX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.02 | 8,700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.62 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.451 | -0.043 | 1,060% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 4.04B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.49 | 8.63 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.86 | 7.19 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.20 | 24.24 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.69 | 45.19 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...