Ad is loading...
NFLDF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
PLG
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.03 (-1.84%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NFLDF vs PLG

Header iconNFLDF vs PLG Comparison
Open Charts NFLDF vs PLGBanner chart's image
Exploits Discovery
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$19.6K
CapitalizationN/A
Platinum Group Metals
Price$1.60
Change-$0.03 (-1.84%)
Volume$418.65K
CapitalizationN/A
NFLDF vs PLG Comparison Chart
Loading...
PLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NFLDF vs. PLG commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFLDF is a Hold and PLG is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NFLDF: $0.04 vs. PLG: $1.60)
Brand notoriety: NFLDF and PLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NFLDF: 15% vs. PLG: 62%
Market capitalization -- NFLDF: $12.7M vs. PLG: $118.83M
NFLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.7M. PLG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $118.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NFLDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NFLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NFLDF and PLG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PLG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

NFLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -24.04% price change this week, while PLG (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLG is expected to report earnings on Jan 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLG($119M) has a higher market cap than NFLDF($12.7M). PLG YTD gains are higher at: 40.351 vs. NFLDF (-60.614). PLG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.09M vs. NFLDF (-9.63M). NFLDF has more cash in the bank: 8.44M vs. PLG (7.11M). NFLDF (0) and PLG (0) have equivalent revenues.
NFLDFPLGNFLDF / PLG
Capitalization12.7M119M11%
EBITDA-9.63M-5.09M189%
Gain YTD-60.61440.351-150%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash8.44M7.11M119%
Total DebtN/A302K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLG: Fundamental Ratings
PLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STBFY16.340.25
+1.55%
Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd
UURAF0.43N/A
N/A
Ucore Rare Metals, Inc.
PNGAY11.68-0.03
-0.26%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China Ltd.
YUEIY10.12-0.24
-2.32%
Yue Yuen Industrial (Holdings) Ltd
CGEMY32.38-1.40
-4.14%
Capgemini SE

NFLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NFLDF and ASM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NFLDF and ASM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFLDF
1D Price
Change %
NFLDF100%
+8.84%
ASM - NFLDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.21%
ISVLF - NFLDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+21.08%
FNLPF - NFLDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
PLG - NFLDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
SLSR - NFLDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
More

PLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLG has been loosely correlated with ASM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLG jumps, then ASM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLG
1D Price
Change %
PLG100%
-1.84%
ASM - PLG
52%
Loosely correlated
-7.21%
HL - PLG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
CDE - PLG
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
MAG - PLG
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
PAAS - PLG
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
More