| NFRA | TOLZ | NFRA / TOLZ | |
| Gain YTD | 7.648 | 11.112 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 2.99B | 194M | 1,543% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.46 | 102% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 9.00 | 144% |
| Yield | 5.52 | 3.67 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| NFRA | TOLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 12 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 83% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PDCC | 10.08 | 0.46 | +4.77% |
| Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc. | |||
| QQQE | 121.55 | -0.13 | -0.11% |
| Direxion NASDAQ-100® Equal Wtd ETF | |||
| TVE | 23.49 | -0.05 | -0.21% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1999 Series A due May 1 2029 | |||
| EMBD | 23.87 | -0.12 | -0.50% |
| Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | |||
| CRDT | 23.08 | -0.32 | -1.36% |
| Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFRA has been loosely correlated with HTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFRA jumps, then HTO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NFRA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFRA | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| HTO - NFRA | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| ES - NFRA | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| CP - NFRA | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| DTE - NFRA | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| PEG - NFRA | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOLZ has been loosely correlated with NFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOLZ jumps, then NFG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOLZ | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| NFG - TOLZ | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| HTO - TOLZ | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| MDU - TOLZ | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| FTS - TOLZ | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| NI - TOLZ | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
More | ||||